cdna production, hybridization and scanning Search Results


microarray chip hybridization and processing  (ATLAS Biolabs GmbH)
90
ATLAS Biolabs GmbH microarray chip hybridization and processing
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Microarray Chip Hybridization And Processing, supplied by ATLAS Biolabs GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/pmc04053374-79-0-8?v=ATLAS+Biolabs+GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray chip hybridization and processing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cdna synthesis, hybridization and scanning using standard protocols  (GenUs Biosystems Inc)
90
GenUs Biosystems Inc cdna synthesis, hybridization and scanning using standard protocols
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Cdna Synthesis, Hybridization And Scanning Using Standard Protocols, supplied by GenUs Biosystems Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/pmc02728106-313-23-13?v=GenUs+Biosystems+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna synthesis, hybridization and scanning using standard protocols - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cdna production, hybridization and scanning  (UCL Genomics)
90
UCL Genomics cdna production, hybridization and scanning
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Cdna Production, Hybridization And Scanning, supplied by UCL Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/10__1523_slash_jneurosci__4256___13__2014-108-17-10?v=UCL+Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna production, hybridization and scanning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cdna synthesis, labeling and hybridization, image scanning, and processing  (Johns Hopkins HealthCare)
90
Johns Hopkins HealthCare cdna synthesis, labeling and hybridization, image scanning, and processing
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Cdna Synthesis, Labeling And Hybridization, Image Scanning, And Processing, supplied by Johns Hopkins HealthCare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/pmc02981246-86-9-25?v=Johns+Hopkins+HealthCare
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna synthesis, labeling and hybridization, image scanning, and processing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cdna synthesis, labeling, hybridization, and scanning processes  (Advanced Throughput Inc)
90
Advanced Throughput Inc cdna synthesis, labeling, hybridization, and scanning processes
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Cdna Synthesis, Labeling, Hybridization, And Scanning Processes, supplied by Advanced Throughput Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/pm22828777-57-4-13?v=Advanced+Throughput+Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna synthesis, labeling, hybridization, and scanning processes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cdna hybridization and scanning  (Incyte corporation)
90
Incyte corporation cdna hybridization and scanning
A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the <t>microarray</t> ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.
Cdna Hybridization And Scanning, supplied by Incyte corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cdna+production%2C+hybridization+and+scanning/10__1055_slash_s___2000___7502-211-43-35?v=Incyte+corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cdna hybridization and scanning - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the microarray ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Responses of a Triple Mutant Defective in Three Iron Deficiency-Induced BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX Genes of the Subgroup Ib(2) to Iron Deficiency and Salicylic Acid

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099234

Figure Lengend Snippet: A, At3g07720; B, CYP82C4 ; C, At3g12900; D, MTPA2 ; E, PPC1 ; F, LHY1 ; G, At1g07050; H, PSAF ; The genes in A–E were identified as potential downstream targets of bHLH subgroup Ib(2) factors, while the genes in F–H indicated a more intense response to –Fe in the mutant (compare to ). 3xbhlh and wild type seedlings were grown for 6 d at + and −Fe and exposed for 6 h to 100 µM SA (+SA) or were mock-treated (−SA). Whole seedlings were harvested for analysis. n = 3; the –Fe cDNA samples were derived from the RNAs used in the microarray ; * indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of −Fe versus +Fe; + indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of 3xbhlh versus WT; § indicates a significant change (p<0.05) of +SA versus –SA. Gene expression was studied using reverse transcription-qPCR.

Article Snippet: Microarray chip hybridization and processing were done by ATLAS Biolabs GmbH, Berlin, Germany.

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Derivative Assay, Microarray, Gene Expression, Reverse Transcription